When Will The West Care About Cyprus ...

From The DailyWire by Uzay Bulut:

 In the 21st century, a member state of the United Nations and the European Union continues to be colonized and occupied by a NATO and UN member and EU hopeful. The colonizer is Turkey and the victim is Cyprus.

Read More »

Some Hope for the Greek Cypriots Enclaved in the Occupied North

A landmark case at the European Court of Human Rights has safeguarded the rights of relatives of Greeks in Istanbul to inherit property even if they are not Turkish nationals.  And this raises hopes for the Greek Cypriots enclaved in the occupied Karpas peninsula where the non-inheritance policy is also applied by the Turkish regime.

This is the view of Achilleas Demetriades - one of the lawyers in the case of late Polyxeni Foka whose blood brothers were awarded five million euros by the Strasbourg-based Court on October 1, 2013.

“I believe this is an important case because it repeats the rights of ‘Romioi’ in Istanbul to have their properties inherited by their heirs who may not necessarily be of Turkish nationality.”

He added: “And it also has a link to Cyprus because a similar policy of non-inheritance was applied with the Karpas enclaved persons who, when they pass away, their relatives living in the government-controlled areas are not allowed to inherit.”

Ekaterini-born Polyxeni was adopted by Apostolos and Elisabeth Bitsika, wealthy Greeks of Istanbul, or Romioi (Greek: Ῥωμαῖοι/Greek: Ρωμιοί, "Romans") as they were branded by the Turks, back in the mid-50s.

She lived there happily and in very comfortable surroundings and when the father died in 1981, the mother inherited the family property.

The mother died in 1987 and Polyxeni actually inherited the property – both movable and immovable property.  But later on the Turkish state decided that this inheritance was contrary to the existing law because she was not a Turkish national.  By that time, she was not very well and was admitted to a psychiatric hospital called Zentiburul with the authorities appointing a guardian.

Meanwhile, her two blood brothers from Ekaterini wanted to help and began contacting Polyxeni who passed away in hospital in 2000.  That’s when the brothers’ interest in the inheritance led to the launch of a litigation in Turkey but their bid was unsuccessful.

So, in 2002 an application was submitted before the ECHR claiming the inheritance rights of the brothers.  The case was successful in 2009 when the Court accepted that a violation had occurred and their right to the property was established.

On October 1, 2013, the judgment for just satisfaction was announced awarding the brothers the sum of €5 million for loss of use and for expropriation and moral damages they had suffered because of these violations.

---Applicable to the enclaved---

Amendments to the ‘inheritance law’ in the occupied areas are already underway and the matter is being discussed before the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, said Achilleas Demetriades.

“It is expected to be finally resolved in June 2014. That is when the Committee of Ministers will issue a decision whether the ‘law’ is in fact adequate remedy to satisfy the actions taken by Turkey remedy the breaches which have been established by the 4th interstate application,” Demetriades said.

“I understand certain memos were generated but it’s a matter handled by the Attorney General’s office…I think the properties in Istanbul may very well be the subject matter of a new immovable property commission set up by Turkey to deal with this dormant for quite some time issue,” he added.

Demetriades wondered whether any of the enclaved people will initiate legal proceedings to challenge the new ‘law’ in the occupied areas and then in Strasbourg.  “The matter of the enclaved is part of the interstate application and the government should deal with it,” he said.

UPDATED Cypriot Permanent Representative to UN denounced Turkey’s violations in Cyprus

NICOSIA - Cypriot Permanent Representative to the United Nations Nicos Emiliou denounced Turkey’s continuing violations in Cyprus that have been taking place ever since the 1974 Turkish invasion of the island.

"In the 1974 Turkish invasion of Cyprus, basic human rights were brutally violated, together with the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of my country. Thirty-nine years later, the occupation of more than one third of Cyprus continues, and massive violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms persist," he said addressing the United Nations General Assembly’s 68th Session of the Third Committee.
He referred to the continued identification process of the remains of missing persons 39 years after the invasion.

"In Cyprus, the past is very much the present," he said, adding that today, Cyprus remains the country with the highest proportion of Internally Displaced Persons as a percentage of its population in the world.

Emilou noted Turkey’s decision to allow the Committee of Missing Persons access to a fenced zone in the occupied areas this year but called on the Turkish Government to fully address this humanitarian issue with urgency, by launching an effective investigation, both on the cases of people whose remains have been identified, as well as those whose fate is still unknown.

He also called Ankara to allow unrestricted access to all relevant information in its archives, as well as to all relevant areas, including military areas, in Cyprus and in Turkey itself.

The Cypriot Representative also referred the living conditions of enclaved persons in the occupied part of Cyprus. "Despite some improvements in recent years, which we recognise and welcome, Greek and Maronite Cypriots living in the occupied areas are still subjected to harassment, restrictions to their movement, denial of access to adequate medical care and curtailment of their freedom of worship, adding that "we are especially alarmed by continuing violations of their property rights, as safeguarded by Article 17 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, including the right to bequeath property to their descendants."

Emiliou furthermore denounced the systematic violations of the right to education of enclaved students, as well as the widespread destruction and looting of religious and cultural heritage in the occupied part of Cyprus is not only a crime against Cyprus, but one against humanity.
"The desecration of religious and historical sites, which began as soon as Turkish troops landed in Cyprus in July 1974, continues today. Around 550 churches and Christian monuments, along with numerous cemeteries, have been desecrated, pillaged, destroyed, converted into mosques, army barracks or worse, or even demolished," he went on to say.

Emilou however, noted that not all is bleak welcoming two recent positive developments in the broader field of religious freedom.

He referred to a senior Muslim cleric who held a service at Hala Sultan Mosque near the city of Larnaca while at the same time, Bishop Christoforos of Karpasia, who had been prevented for the past 18 months from visiting his diocese in the occupied part, was allowed to visit his enclaved flock and the monastery of Apostolos Andreas in north-eastern Cyprus.

Emiliou announced that a restoration project through the bi-communal Technical Committee on Cultural Heritage will begin in the coming months for Monastery of Apostolos Andreas, one of the most important religious sites on the island, which has been left to decay since the Turkish invasion of 1974.

"Such developments, small as they may be, are proof of the powerful yearn of the Cypriot people for peaceful coexistence and give all Cypriots, hope for a reunited future," Emiliou went on to say.

At the backdrop of renewed efforts to launch a new UN-led initiative for the solution of the Cyprus problem, Emiliou underlined that for the effort to reunify Cyprus to succeed, these violations must cease at once.

"We call on Turkey to end the occupation, recall its troops and apply and respect the resolutions and recommendations of all relevant UN and other international bodies, thus restoring peace and security and the human rights and dignity of all the people of Cyprus. This is of vital importance, not just for Cyprus, but also for the credibility and moral standing of this Organisation," he concluded.

ECHR awards Greek Cypriots damages due to Turkish occupation

ECHR awards Greek Cypriots damages due to Turkish occupation

Turkey has been ordered to pay thousands of euro in damages to Greek Cypriots for violating their human right to peaceful enjoyment of their property in Cyprus’ northern Turkish occupied areas. 

The European Court of Human Rights on Tuesday delivered its judgment regarding the allegation by 13 Greek Cypriot applicants (Lordos and Others v. Turkey) that “the Turkish occupation of the northern part of Cyprus following the 1974 conflict had deprived them of their homes and properties”. 

In its judgment today, the Court awarded each of the applicants between EUR 100,000 and EUR 8,000,000 “for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages and EUR 15,000 jointly to all applicants for costs and expenses”.

In its principal judgment, delivered on 2 November 2010, the Court held in particular that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) as concerns eight of the applicants and a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) with regard to seven of the applicants.

Cyprus has been divided since 1974, when Turkey invaded and occupied its northern third.

Turkey occupied 36,2 percent of the sovereign territory of the Republic and forcibly expelled about 180.000 Greek Cypriots from their homes. Another 20.000 Greek Cypriots, who had remained in the occupied areas, were also forced to eventually abandon their homes and seek refuge in the safety of the government controlled areas. Today, fewer than 500 enclaved Greek Cypriots remain in the occupied areas.

Turkey still deprives the displaced Greek Cypriots of their right to return to their homes and properties. This has given rise to appeals to the European Court of Human Rights, which has issued major decisions on Turkey’s violations of the European Convention.

Enclaved Greek Cypriots

Who are they?

As a consequence of the tragedy brought about by the first and second rounds of the Turkish invasion on 20 July and 15 August 1974, about 200.000 Greek Cypriots, who lived in the areas occupied by the Turkish troops, were compelled by force to leave their homes and properties and move to the free areas. They became refugees in their own land. However, despite the policy of terror implemented by Turkish troops, the hardships, oppressions, intimidations and threats, about 12.300 people refused to leave their homes in the area occupied by the invaders and tried to keep their possessions - their land, their homes and their property. Since then, these people have been known as the enclaved and their plight has been one of the most tragic aspects of the Cyprus problem.

Facts prove the sad reality

Immediately after the end of the hostilities in 1974, the enclaved were about 12.300 people, most of them Greek Cypriots and a few Maronites. They were mainly concentrated in the Karpass penins- la and particularly in the villages of Rizokarpaso, Agia Trias, Leonarisso, Agios Andronikos, Agios Therissos, Trikomo, Karpaseia, Kormakitis, Asomatos, in the town of Keryneia and in Apostolos Andreas Monastery (see map on page 24). In 1994, only 715 enclaved (520 Greek Cypriots and 195 Maronite Cypriots), the vast majority of whom are above 60 years old, remain in the occupied areas. It is to be noted that since 30 June 1994 there are no longer any enclaved in Trikomo.The sharp reduction in their number was due to the systematic expulsions organised by the illegal authorities together with their policy of harassment (see graphs on page 23). All these combined with a well-planned project of colonisation of the occupied parts of Cyprus, with the influx of about 85.000 Turkish mainland settlers, aimed at changing the demographic character of the island.

The table below shows the occupied areas where the enclaved live and the number in each area as it was on 30.6.1994.

	VILLAGE OR TOWN	POPULATION
1	RIZOKARPASO	355
2	KORMAKITIS	159
3	AGIA TRIAS	134
4	KARPASEIA	24
5	ASOMATOS	13
6	LEONARISSO	10
7	AGIOS ANDRONIKOS	6
8	AGIOS THERISSOS	6
9	APOSTOLOS ANDREAS MONASTERY	4
10	KERYNEIA	4
11	TRIKOMO	0
	TOTAL	715

The methods of the Turkish leadership include a wide variety of inhuman acts, ranging from physical violence to psychological brutality, so as to force the inhabitants of the various villages to sign "applications" to move to the government-controlled areas. This was intended to enable them to carry on expelling the enclaved under the pretext that the Greek Cypriots "move on their own free will" after submitting applications and that "although not encouraged to stay, they are not forcibly expelled". The expulsions, which are part of Turkey's policy of ethnic cleansing directed against the Greek Cypriots, were intensified between 1975-77 while the talks were still going on and despite of the Third Vienna Agreement, and continued later on, in 1981. The year in which the expulsions intensified was in 1976, leading to a reduction of 57% in the population of the enclaved.

POPULATION DEVELOPMENT OF ENCLAVED

END OF YEAR	POPULATION OF ENCLAVED NUMBER	REDUCTION	%
1974	12.289	-	-
1975	9.544	-2.745	-22
1976	4.095	-5.449	-57
1977	2.627	-1.468	-36
1978	2.315	-312	-12
1979	1.989	-326	-14
1980	1.807	-182	-9
1981	1.477	-330	-18
1982	1.316	-161	-11
1983	1.250	-66	-5
1984	1.133	-117	-9
1985	1.050	-83	-7
1986	1.015	-35	-3
1987	951	-64	-6
1988	908	-49	-5
1989	869	-33	-4
1990	824	-45	-5
1991	788	-36	-4
1992	753	-35	-4
1993	728	-25	-3
1994*	715	-	-

• NOTE: Number of enclaved on 30.6.1994

What has urged these people to remain on their land of their own free will despite the hardships they have endured?

Above all it was their great love of their places of origin, of their homes and of their property with which they have become closely linked due to their hard labour. Another factor which contributed to this, was the expectation for a quick solution to the Cyprus problem and the strong belief that justice would prevail, thanks to the intervention of the international community.
Finally, the fear of becoming refugees and the uncertainty they would face, if they abandoned their property, also provided another incentive for staying. The Cyprus government has assisted them by offering monthly subsidies for food through UNFICYP. On 5 August 1994 they also received an allowance to repair their houses. In addition to the government, individuals, and in particular, elementary school teachers, priests and nuns, have all actively and tirelessly contributed to the welfare of the enclaved, despite repeated threats against their lives by the illegal regime.

The Third Vienna Agreement

In 1975 an agreement was concluded between the intercommunal negotiators, Glafcos Clerides (the present President of the Republic) and the Turkish Cypriot leader, Rauf Denktash, regarding the Greek Cypriots living in the occupied areas and the Turkish Cypriots living in the government controlled areas. The major provisions of this agreement, known as the Third Vienna Agreement, according to a press communique issued on 4 August 1975, are the following:

1. The Turkish Cypriots at present in the south of the island will be allowed if they want to do so, to proceed north with their belongings under an organized programme and with the assistance of UNFICYP.
   
2. Mr Denktash reaffirmed and it was agreed "that the Greek Cypriots in the north of the island are free to stay and that they will be given every help to lead a normal life, including facilities for education and for the practice of their religion, as well as medical care by their own doctors and freedom of movement in the north."
   
3. The Greek Cypriots at present in the north who, at their own request and without having been subjected to any kind of pressure, wish to move to the south will be free to do so.
   
4. UNFICYP will have free and normal access to Greek Cypriot villages and habitations in the north.
   
5. In connection with the implementation of the above agreement, priority will be given to the reunification of families, which may also involve the transfer of a number of Greek Cypriots, at present in the south, to the north.
   

Has this Agreement ever been implemented?
The Cyprus government implemented the part of the agreement regarding the Turkish Cypriots; consequently, all Turkish Cypriots, except a few living in the areas controlled by the State, were transferred to the occupied areas according to the provisions of the agreement.
It must be noted, however, that the vast majority of them did not leave on their own free will but were forced to move to the occupied areas through the use of various brutal acts perpetrated by TMT, the illegal terrorist organisation of the Denktash regime. The touching scenes of parting with neighbours, which took place then, constitute a real proof that Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots can co-exist. None of the provisions of the agreement regarding the Greek Cypriots living in the occupied areas, was ever implemented by the Denktash regime. The Turkish Cypriot leader, Rauf Denktash, not only failed to honour his signature by implementing the agreement he signed, but he repeatedly violated all its provisions. In their persistent attempt to take advantage of the de facto situation and divide the island by changing its demographic character, Turkey and the Turkish Cypriot regime have implemented a series of well-planned coercive and suppressive measures, imposed on the Greek Cypriot enclaved, in order to throw them out of their homes and properties. Blatant violations of human rights
confirmed by objective reports

United Nations

A confidential UN report condemns Turkish Cypriot "authorities" for the systematic abuse of the human rights of the enclaved Greek Cypriots, who remained in the occupied area following the 1974 invasion.
The report, prepared in April 1994, documents in detail the pressures brought to bear on the 12.300 Greek Cypriots who remained in the Karpass Peninsula following the 1974 invasion. These ranged from restrictions on travel, the right to own property, freedom of movement and discrimination in education, health care and religion. The outcome of the afore-mentioned is, that only 570 Greek Cypriots remain in the Karpass today. In a condemnation of Turkey and of the Turkish Cypriot leadership, the report concludes: " the Greek Cypriots of Karpass are now a small minority in a part of Cyprus, which was once almost totally Greek Cypriot, and they are subject to a system whose long-term aim appears to be directed towards the eventual extinction of the Greek Cypriot community in Karpass."
The report, which was sent to the UN Secretary General in April, documents what amounts to an open breach of the 1975 Vienna Agreement, under which the Turkish Cypriot side agreed to protect the interests of the enclaved. It also acknowledges that the UN peacekeeping mission has been "frustrated, hampered and limited" in its efforts to implement and monitor the Vienna Agreement.
"This is the result of a deliberate policy on the part of the 'northern' authorities. That policy is based primarily on restricting UNFICYP's freedom of movement and access to the Greek Cypriot community and is contrary to the Vienna Agreement", the report states. Report of ASME-HUMANITAS
The H. Struebig/A. Krieg delegation of the German humanitarian organisation ASMEHUMANITAS, which visited Cyprus in April 1976, had instructions to investigate violations of humanitarian provisions. They had the opportunity to visit the Turkish occupied part of Cyprus and to talk to the authorities responsible for the Turkish Cypriot community.
After Mr Denktash's protests, the delegation continued its investigations and completed the final report in 1977. According to the report: "... b) the population in the north faces great difficulties because of lack of security for their lives and property.
c) The conditions of life of the Greek Cypriots in the north are particularly oppressive as they are deprived of their basic human rights. We established these facts by visiting the Karpass area and talking to many persons on May 3rd 1977. In particular:

1. they are deprived of the freedom of movement and trade.
2. They live under permanent fear for their life and property because of continuous harassment by the mainland Turks and lack of protection.
3. They are deprived of secondary education and of sufficient elementary school facilities.
4. They are deprived of proper medical services.
5. They are not allowed to look after their fields freely and in many cases not even at all.
6. Homes and other properties are often the object of theft and the people are being beaten and generally inhumanely treated.
   The problems of the population in the north are becoming greater because of the attitude of the mainland Turks who have settled there in thousands. We received many complaints of many crimes and atrocities committed by the mainland Turks against the population of the north, both Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots without being punished..."

Council of Europe

Various violations of human rights are denounced in the report dated 10 July 1976 and further confirmed by the European Commission of the Council of Europe report, dated 9 October 1983 and in particular :

• Deprivation of possessions, looting and wanton destruction. The Commission accepted testimony as proving beyond any reasonable doubt that looting and robbery on an extensive scale by Turkish troops and Turkish Cypriots have taken place.
  
• Discrimination. The Commission notes that the acts violating the Convention were exclusively directed against members of one of the two communities in Cyprus, namely the Greek Cypriot community.
  

Council of Europe rapporteur on the demographic structure of the Cypriot communities, Mr CUCO, denounces this situation in his report dated 27 April 1992: "I drew a preliminary conclusion from my talks with all the parties concerned: the establishment of Turkish settlers in the northern part of the island is an indisputable fact. The presence and naturalisation of the settlers undoubtledly constitutes a further barrier to a peaceful negotiated solution of the Cyprus conflict."
The report was adopted by the Assembly on 7 October 1992.

European Ministers of Education

On 28 September 1994, the European Ministers of Education expressed concern about the difficult circumstances under which schools operate in the occupied areas of Cyprus. Their views were included in reply letters sent to Cypriot Minister of Education and Culture, Claire Angelidou, who appealed for their intervention to persuade Turkey to allow schools to operate in more humane and safe conditions.

Foreign press reports

Dozens of articles were written in the foreign press about the inhumane living conditions the enclaved are suffering in the occupied areas. We mention only a few of them:

• The Sunday Times, 6 November 1977 In an article dated 6/11/1977, the English newspaper The Sunday Times reports the following: "accounts of a widow's murder and of another alleged murder and an attempted murder have been revealed by refugees. Greek Cypriots say the murder was only the latest in a series of incidents in the township of Rizokarpaso, in the isolated north eastern tip of the divided island, aimed at terrorising the township's remaining Greeks into fleeing south and leaving their property for the Turks. The Cyprus government has asked the United Nations peace-keeping force to investigate all three "but the Turks don't allow us to investigate", said a U.N. spokesman."
  
• Die Weltwoche, 30 August 1978 In a report published on 30/8/1978 in the German-language Swiss newspaper, Die Weltwoche, Peter Schmid, who visited the occupied part of Cyprus as a guest of the Denktash regime, describes the experience he had during a visit to Rizokarpaso, which reveals the state of terror under which the enclaved live. ÒI ordered a drink at the Greek tavern and when the proprietor brought it, I followed him into the kitchen to talk to him in private. The grey-haired man avoided my eyes and evaded every question. "Speak freely," I urged him. "That would be the end", he whispered. Outside, in a covered market place, I found that several hundred Greeks, mainly wrinkled old people had gathered together. When their clothing is distributed, their names are called out and the items of charity are thrown to the recipient."
• Milliyet, 8-14 January 1979 A Turkish journalist, Refik Erduran, confirms that the enclaved live under inhuman conditions and speaks of the need to rectify this situation, as it would serve Turkish propaganda. In a series of seven articles on the Cyprus problem, published in the Instanbul daily Milliyet (8-14/1/79) he writes that the Cyprus government "repairs and maintains even the empty Turkish Cypriot houses. It also makes sure that the foreigners on the island observe this fact. But the money spent is well worth the positive impression it creates. We too had a trump card we could use in the same way. We could ensure that the handful of Greek Cypriots who remain in the Karpass peninsula could achieve a higher standard of living than the one they enjoyed before. We could meet their educational, transportation and health needs; we could prevent any settler from moving into their villages, we could make sure that they would not feel uncomfortable in any way, we could provide them with credits and agricultural aid. We could almost force them to live better. We could do all this at a cost of 5 to 10 million Turkish liras and the region would pay this money back in produce in a few years. Then we could exhibit this showcase to the whole world.
  But we did not do any of these things. Our inadequacy in propaganda springs not from lack of words but from our inability to make proper use of such opportunities."
• 24 Heures, 3 June 1980 Having visited Cyprus in 1980, Gilberate Favre of the French-language Swiss newspaper 24 Heures, reported the following:
  "The number of Greek Cypriot refugees is not about to diminish for nearly everyday, Cypriots enclaved in the Karpass region, in the Famagusta district, are expelled by the Turkish army.
  "A quarter of an hour to leave everything" According to refugees' testimonies, the methods of intimidation of the Turkish army are diverse. First of all, there is the daily war of humiliations and "punishments" to give an example of them. There is also an attempt to give this policy of expulsion an aspect of legality although, in actual fact, it is contrary to the Charter of Human Rights. "I was given a quarter of an hour to leave my house and my village", a refugee says. "Turkish soldiers made me sign a statement according to which I wanted to leave my village. Then they took me to the U.N. zone and showed my statement to U.N. soldiers." ... Nodding his head saddly, an old man, who has lived under Turkish occupation for four years, tells me that he was willing to put up with almost anything in order to remain in his house and in his ancestral village."

A few illustrations of the blatant violations of human rights

In order to eliminate the Greek Cypriot element from the occupied areas, completely isolate the two communities of the island and allege that co-existence is "unrealistic", a most reprehensible policy was conceived, i.e a combination of the brutal separation of families with the systematic colonisation of the occupied areas. There is a continuous influx of thousands of Turkish settlers from Anatolia, who do not only change the demographic structure of the island but also harass both Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots living in the occupied areas. The mainland settlers, estimated presently at about 85.000, were used as a lever of pressure on the enclaved so as to force them to abandon their homes. Most of the crimes committed by Turkish mainland settlers against Greek Cypriot enclaved, were intended to terrorise them further, so as to leave their land and properties which were subsequently distributed amongst the mainland settlers.
Threats constitute another measure of psychological pressure. Some of the threats used to "persuade" the Greek Cypriots to sign applications are the following: "If you do not sign, you will join the ranks of the missing", "if you do not sign, you will in any case be removed from your home and be taken to another area," "if you do not sign, you will in any case be evicted, but without any of your belongings". In order to realise the full extent of the violations of human rights in the case of the enclaved, the following are some illustrations of the inhumanities perpetrated against the Greek Cypriots in the Turkish occupied area. It is to be noted that this is not a compehensive list.

1. Separation of families. The vast majority of Greek Cypriot prisoners of war were released in the areas controlled by the Government of the Republic of Cyprus and were never allowed to be reunited with their wives and children as should be the case according to the provisions of the Vienna Agreement.
   In addition, most children were obliged to leave their homes in order to go to secondary school. In both cases, families were either brutally separated or obliged to move to the south so as to lead a normal family life again. Children under sixteen are allowed to visit their parents during the Christmas and Easter holidays, but always at the discretion of the occupying regime. Many has been the time when the children, ready to take the bus, have been turned back.
2. Lack of Education. The lack of education possibilities for their children is another form of indirect but effective pressure exerted on the enclaved to make them leave their land. The Denktash regime has never allowed the operation of secondary schools. Only three elementary schools were allowed to operate in the villages of Rizokarpaso, Kormakitis and Agia Trias. Thus, many children are obliged to come to the areas under the control of the Cyprus Republic, away from their families in order to attend secondary schools. Another form of pressure is the refusal of the Turkish Cypriot regime to allow any replacements of teachers, who were forced to leave the occupied areas. Today there are only four teachers left. They are obliged to face the threats of the illegal regime on a daily basis and they have to make enormous efforts and undergo many sacrifices in order to keep the three elementary schools in operation. In the two elementary schools for Greek Cypriots, the very few pupils are not allowed to be taught history, religion and geography of Cyprus. Despite the fact that the Ministry of Education sends the textbooks on time, in July, these are kept and "checked" by the Denktash regime which delivers them around the end of November or at the beginning of December or it may choose not to deliver them at all.
   
3. Murders. There is a long list of murders of helpless people, mostly the elderly. Incidents of murders were reported with dates and specific details by people who were once enclaved. In most cases, they have been confirmed by foreign press reports. Such characteristic cases are the ones of Demetris Demetri and Flourentza Flourou from Rizokarpaso, who were both robbed, stabbed, cut into pieces and eventually burnt by mainland settlers in May 1990. Even in the case of such incidents, the so-called "police" of the Denktash regime has taken no measures to protect the enclaved and never has any offender been arrested or punished.
   
4. Rapes and threatened rapes. A flagrant case of rape was that of a fourteen-year-old girl who, on 3/10/76 was raped in the presence of her father, who was at the same time assaulted, beaten up and robbed.
   
5. Savage beatings. Greek Cypriot men of all ages are savagely beaten up and then asked to sign applications to leave, under some pretext or another, and frequently without a pretext. This is a daily occurrence in all occupied Greek Cypriot villages.
6. Detention and ill-treatment. Greek Cypriot men are arrested and detained for a number of days, without reason, ill-treated and then asked to sign applications in order to leave.
7. Forced labour and humiliations. Forced labour and humiliation are part of the everyday life of the enclaved. The innumerable occasions when Turks have forced Greek Cypriots to carry out specific tasks are vividly described by those previously enclaved who sought refuge and are now living in the area controlled by the Cyprus government. They describe, for instance, how Greek Cypriots were forced to build the house of a sergeant of the Denktash "police" in Agios Andronikos and were then refused payment for their work.
8. Plundering of movable and immovable property. Enclaved Greek Cypriots, who were not able to prove, by producing title- deeds, that the houses in which they lived belonged to them (either because they lost the title-deeds or because the houses belonged to their children or parents) were forcibly driven out and were obliged to live in barracks or with relatives. Their houses were subsequently seized by the Turkish Cypriot administration. On many occasions, property owned by the enclaved was confiscated and given to settlers from mainland Turkey. The property, which had not officially been confiscated by the Denktash regime, was either plundered by mainland settlers or included in the military "restricted areas" or, was out-of-bounds to the enclaved. In addition, the enclaved were never certain that they would ever enjoy any income from their labour. In many cases, mainland settlers would harvest the fields sown by the Greek Cypriots, the lawful owners of those fields.
9. Burglaries. This is a routine event, from which no home escapes. Even the elderly, as well as the invalided are not spared. With a view to terrorising the enclaved, masked men raid the houses of the enclaved Greek Cypriots during the night, whom they beat up, sometimes to death.
   Another method widely adopted to terrorise the Greek Cypriots, includes knocking on doors during the night, throwing stones at houses and firing shots in the air.
10. No freedom of movement. Greek Cypriot in the Turkish occupied area has ever been granted anything remotely resembling freedom of movement. They are all strictly confined to the precincts of their villages and are subjected to strict curfews. The enclaved are not allowed to visit the nearby villages without "police" supervision, unless they report to the "police" on the purpose of their visit beforehand. All men between the ages of 18 and 50 must report to the "police" once a week. Even today the enclaved are not allowed to visit the free areas unless they have submitted an application. Such applications must be submitted two weeks in advance and time limitations are imposed on their stay in the government controlled area. Many are the times the Denktash regime has denied them permission to visit the area controlled by the government of Cyprus. As a result, the Greek Cypriot enclaved can never be sure when they will be able to do so.
    The steps taken to isolate and restrict the movement of the Greek Cypriots have been intensified as the years passed. As a result, the enclaved are not even allowed to go out in the fields near their villages without the permission of the Turkish Cypriot "police". As for the visits to nearby villages or to the town of Ammochostos, they are very rare indeed. When they occur, they always take place under the supervision of the Turkish Cypriot "police".
    
11. No communication. The Greek Cypriot enclaved are always forbidden to come into contact with any visitors unless the so-called "policemen" of the Denktash regime are present. Even direct contact with UNFICYP soldiers, whose movement is seriously limited, is not allowed without the presence of "policemen". When food is distributed by the United Nations,"policemen" are present in order to prevent any free conversation between the enclaved and U.N. soldiers. Moreover, communication between the enclaved and their relatives in the free areas is virtually impossible as there is not a single telephone in the villages inhabited by the enclaved. Correspondence with their relatives is only allowed through the United Nations but mail is checked by the "police" of the Denktash regime.
    
12. No medical care. The provision of the Third Vienna Agreement concerning medical care was never implemented. No Greek Cypriot doctors were ever allowed to settle in the area or to visit the enclaved on a regular basis. The Denktash regime refuses to give permission to the enclaved to visit the free areas for medical care. There have been, for example, incidents in which the enclaved were forced to leave their houses and land and move to the free areas because of health problems and the lack of adequate medical care in the occupied areas. Following their recovery and when they wish to return to their houses the Denktash regime refuses to allow them back.
    
13. Restriction of trade. The shepherds are restricted to grazing their flocks only a short distance outside their village. They use old abandoned houses in the villages as sheepfolds in order to try to prevent animal robberies by the mainland settlers. Moreover, Turkish settlers take their sheep into the cultivated fields, thus, destroying the crops.
    Fishermen are no longer allowed to fish and their boats have been mostly stolen by the Turks.
    Moreover, according to witnesses, Turkish settlers used to buy their groceries on credit from shops owned by Greek Cypriots but never payed for them. Every kind of commercial and economic deal between enclaved Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots is prohibited "by law". Anybody caught violating this ban is arrested and brought before Turkish Cypriot courts which impose heavy fines. The object of this measure is to impose such financial constraints on the enclaved so as to force them to request their transfer to the free areas.
    Apart from farming restrictions, their ability to earn a living is further limited by their being forced to sell their produce at ridiculously low prices.
14. Religious intolerance. The enclaved Greek Cypriots are unable to practice their religion freely. They are not allowed to attend church services and it is forbidden for the church bells to toll. Besides, it must be noted that most churches have been desecrated. In 1994, there were only two priests in the occupied areas.
15. House searches. Turkish "police" search Greek Cypriot houses requesting ownership documents for items such as cookers, heaters and radios etc. Any items for which no such documents can be produced, are confiscated.

19 years after the signing of the Vienna Agreement...

Almost two decades after the signing of the Agreement, Greek Cypriot enclaved, whose population has dramatically shrunk to a point threatening their future existence there, continue to live in appalling and unacceptable conditions.

Do the enclaved have a future?

Concluding, it is obvious that the enclaved face an extremely serious danger. Unless practical measures are implemented, they are condemned to annihilation as their existence is being seriously threatened.

The role of the international community

Only the international community can urge Turkey to comply with international law and finally, fully implement the Third Vienna Agreement in the form of a temporary measure until a final and just solution of the Cyprus problem is reached. In this respect, the international community should, above all, become aware of the tragedy and calamities of the enclaved, and consequently safeguard the right of these people to remain in their ancestral land in conditions of safety and dignity.

A humanitarian issue

It should be understood that as this is obviously a humanitarian issue, a special and separate aspect from the political aspects of the Cyprus problem and an issue of violation of human rights, the implementation of the Third Vienna Agreement is a matter of ethics and of principle. If not rectified, Turkey's unacceptable conduct might prove to be a dangerous precedent for some unscrupulous leaders, who will certainly not hesitate to imitate such a conduct because of the international community's tolerance.

A test case for Turkish good will

The respect of the human rights of the enclaved on the part of the Turkish side is a test case for Turkish credibility for any future agreement. The intransigence of the Turkish side in the case of this humanitarian issue leads to justifiable queries: "How can the Greek Cypriots trust any future agreement when the existing agreement on the enclaved has been so blatantly violated?"
Finally, the role of the enclaved in the success of any future settlement of the Cyprus issue and in the creation of confidence between the two communities is underestimated. This handful of people could be the link between them, they could be the bridge between the occupied areas and the free areas and the proof (contrary to the allegations of advocates in favour of the partition of the island) that the two communities can and must co-exist in order to build together a brilliant future for a single and sovereign Republic of Cyprus.

THE MISSING CYPRIOTS

The humanitarian problem of the missing persons in Cyprus, could be described as the most tragic issue of all. Altogether 1,619 Greek Cypriots including civilians, women, children and old people - who in most cases were seen alive in the hands of the Turks well after the cessation of hostilities, in August 1974, have not been seen since and their fate remains unknown.

Considering that the Greek Cypriot population at the time numbered only 530,000, this figure is excessively large. If we were to calulate the number of American missing persons during the eight-year Vietnam war by analogy to the missing persons of Cyprus in relation to its population, then this number would be approximately 750,000.

There is indisputable evidence that most of those who never returned were detained by Turkish soldiers and/or armed Turkish Cypriot elements under the command and control of the Turkish Army during the Turkish invasion. Evidence that Greek Cypriots were captured and held in concentration camps was not disputed even by the Turkish side. The Turkish authorities themselves had issued lists of Greek Cypriot prisoners of war but subsequently some of these people were never released and yet no explanation on the part of Turkey has been forthcoming.

There were also people who were listed by the International Committee of the Red Cross (I.C.R.C.) as prisoners of war or as enclaved persons in the Turkish occupied areas of Cyprus but who were not released. Greek Cypriot prisoners who had sent messages to their families over the illegal Turkish Cypriot radio "Bayrak" are still missing. Other missing persons were identified in photographs in Turkish newspapers.

The U.N. General Assembly in its Resolution 3450 of 9 December 1975, expressed concern "about the fate of a considerable number of Cypriots who are missing as a result of armed conflict in Cyprus" and reaffirmed the basic human need of their families in Cyprus to be informed about the fate of their missing relatives.

Despite repeated appeals by the Government of Cyprus and the relatives of the missing persons and a number of International Organisations to the Turkish Government, Turkey, contrary to International Law and in particular the provisions of International Human Rights Instruments refuses to provide any information about the fate of the 1,619 missing Greek Cypriots. Instead, the Turkish Government insists that they must be considered dead, without evidence. Turkey's negative approach to the issue explains to a great extent the lack of any progress in the efforts for resolving the issue pursued through the Committee on Missing Persons established in 1981 and operating in accordance with the relevant UN General Assembly Resolutions.

Turkey's insistence that it knows nothing about the fate of the missing persons and that no Greek Cypriots are held is not supported by any facts. On the few occasions where the Turkish side was compelled to accept during discussions in the presence of UN and ICRC Representatives - unanounced visits to places where according to information Greek Cypriots were to be found, several Greek Cypriot "missing" persons were found imprisoned in the areas occupied by the Turkish Army.

In 1975, the Human Rights Organization Amnesty International, presented the Turkish Government with a list of 40 missing persons about whom it had compiled such evidence which, in most cases, points to their presence in Turkish prisons. No response to Amnesty's demand for an account was ever received from the Turkish Government.

The European Commission of Human Rights of the Council of Europe in its report which was adopted on 10 July 1976, on the violation of human rights by Turkey in Cyprus, found Turkey responsible under the Convention on the issue of the missing persons. The Commission concluded that:

"There is a presumption of Turkish responsibility for the fate of persons shown to have been in Turkish custody. However, on the basis of the material before it, the Commission has been unable to ascertain whether and under what circumstances Greek Cypriot prisoners declared to be `missing' have been deprived of their life".

Turkey's refusal to provide the families of the missing persons with any information about the fate of their relatives is also in contravention to the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Human Rights Conventions.

Faced with a stalemate, the Third Committee of the U.N. General Assembly took up the issue of the missing persons in December 1982 and adopted a new resolution in which it expressed concern over the lack of progress towards the commencement of the investigative work of the Committee on Missing Persons and invited the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances of the Commission on Human Rights to recommend ways and means of overcoming the pending procedural difficulties.

The Turkish Cypriot leader, Mr. Denktash, reacted strongly to the adoption of this resolution and stated that it was binding on the Turkish Cypriot side.

The political Affairs Committee of the European Parliament also took up the issue of the missing persons, following a report by the British Europarliamentarian Lady Elles, Vice-President of the European Parliament and Rapporteur of the Political Committee of the European Parliament on Questions of Missing Persons.

On 11 January 1983 the European Parliament overwhelmingly passed a resolution on the situation in Cyprus in which it "emphasizes that the families of the missing people have a right to know the truth and urges the Foreign Ministers meeting in political cooperation to redouble their efforts to find a positive solution", to this humanitarian problem. Furthermore, it "draws the Minister's attention to the need to find a final solution to this painful problem without delay, particularly through the release of those missing people who might be detained in prison".

The need to resolve this purely humanitarian issue as quickly as possible was underlined by the Special Coordinator on Cyprus at the State Department. Ambassador Ledsky, who recently stated that "I think it is high time that the missing persons issue was resolved".

The C.M.P. in its April 11, 1990, extensive Communique recognizes that no real progress has been made in the results of its work and appealed to all concerned to pursue with renewed vigour their assistance so that the Committee can accomplish its humanitarian mission. What is required is conclusive evidence and information that would enable the Committee to reach conclusions which would be convincing to the families concerning the fate of their loved ones as well as to the international community.

MISSING PERSONS

Missing Persons	Men	Women	Total
Reservists/Soldiers	992	--	992
Civilians	511	116	627
Total	1503	116	1619

Age	Over 60	40-60	16-39	Under 16	Total
Men	257	226	995	25	1503
Women	58	15	41	2	116
Total	315	241	1036	27	1619

"Milliyet Halk Gazetesi"
23 Haziran 1976

Translation of the Article in Milliyet.

In the issue of the Instanbul daily, Milliyet of 23rd June, 1976 (page 5) Mr Mehmet Ali Birand, the Turkish journalist who visited Cyprus, writes under the heading ALLOW US TO SEARCH FOR THE MISSING PERSONS:

"One of the problems created after the war is the missing Greek Cypriots" question. In order to find these missing persons the Greeks have formed a Committee. Formed after the pattern of similar committees during the British administration of Cyprus, the Committee is working very efficiently.

The President of the Committee, Mr Fysentzides, has appealed to Turkey and to the Turkish community in Cyprus to help them locate these missing persons.

Mr Fysentzides has said in his appeal:"Relying on the pictures published in the Turkish press and on the documents and lists submitted by the UN and Turkish authorities, we have established that 2,000 of our compatriots are missing after the Turkish military operation. They are our fathers and sons. As families we are in distress. We want to know whether or not they are dead. If they are, we will try to remedy our grief. However, the Turkish leadership is refusing to answer our call. This has nothing to do with propaganda. If the Turkish authorities agree, we will send four or five people and under the Turkish army's supervision, we will search for them, because we have established from the list submitted to us that they are alive. Try to understand our suffering and help us".

The Pancyprian Committee of Parents and Relatives of Undeclared Prisoners of War and Missing Persons bases its arguments on pictures published in the Turkish press and on UN name-lists of prisoners to be returned. The Committee believes that the missing persons are still alive and perhaps it could locate and find some of them. "We are ready to obey all your orders", says the Committee's President".

Under this interview a picture is published in which four Greek National Guardsmen are shown surrendering to the Turkish forces. Mr Birand writes:

"The Greeks are continuing their propaganda, especially on missing persons and POWs. People visiting Cyprus are handed brochures in which the above picture is included. The following is printed under the picture:` This picture was taken by a Turkish war correspondent captured by Greek National Guardsmen'.

When I returned to Turkey, Mr Ergun Konuksever saw the picture by chance and quickly recognised it and said:` It was I who took this picture when I was wounded in Kuchuk Kaimakli (Omorphita) and taken prisoner by Greeks. They seized my three cameras and films. In spite of the UN's decision, they did not return them to me when I was freed. I remember very well taking this picture in Serdali (Chattos village) during the tank operation. These are the Greek POWs captured by the tank crew MERIC I and the soldier in the foreground is Corporal Mustafa from SAMSUN offering cigarettes to the POW's".

SPECIAL - N E W S - B U L L E T I N

Special NEWS BULLETIN (a Turkish Cypriot Publication), Wed- nesday 4 September 1974

Greek Cypriot POW's during lunch hour. They were visited yesterday by the Representatives of the Turkish Red Crescent who toured all Prisoner of War Camps in the Turkish controlled region of the island to ascertain the needs of the prisoners.

The following persons, identifield in the photo, are still missing:

1. Korellis Antonakis tou Michael, age 30, from Kythrea
2. Nicolaou Paniccos tou Chrysostomou, age 26, from Achna
3. Skordis Christoforos tou Georghiou, age 25, from Dhali
4. Papayiannis Ioannis tou Charalambous, age 24, from Anglandjia
5. Hadjikyriakos Philippos tou Stephani, age 19, from Famagusta

Names of persons arrested by the Turks who conveyed messages to their families over the illegal Turkish Cypriot "Bayrak" while in captivity and whose present whereabouts are unknown:

Name Surname

1. ANDREOU SOTIRIS
2. CHRYSILIOU ANASTASIOS
3. CONSTANTINOU COSTAS
4. DRAKOS GEORGHIOS
5. GEORGALLAS GEORGHIOS
6. HADJIKYRIAKOU GEORHIOS
7. KALAPODAS CHRISTAKIS
8. KORELLIS ANTONAKIS
9. KOUSPOU SOTERIS
10. MICHAEL GEORHIOS
11. MOUSCOU CHRISTAKIS
12. PAPACHRISTOFOROU ALEXANDROS
13. PETRI CHRISTOS
14. PYRKOS DEMETRIOS
15. YAGOUMETTIS IACOVOS
16. ZAMBAS MICHALAKIS

TESTIMONIES DOCUMENTING MESSAGES BROADCASTED ON BAYRAK FROM PERSONS STILL MISSING

Summary of testimony given by Kiki Andreou Symeonides from Kythrea

During the course of the second phase of the Turkish invasion, that is on 14.8.74, Kiki Andreou together with her family went to Kalopanayiotis. On 15 or 16 August 1974 and at about 20:00 while she was listening to the Greek broadcast of the illegal Turkish Cypriot radiostation BAYRAK, the announcer said that at that moment messages by captured national guardsmen would be broadcast. Among those who spoke she heard her co-villager Antonakis Korellis, whom she knew very well say: I am Antonakis Korellis from Kythrea, we are doing fine.

Both her family and herself were certain that the person who spoke was indeed her co-villager, Antonakis Korellis.

Summary of testimony given by Yiannoula Paviou Argyrou from Kato Lakatamia

On 8 or 9 August 1974 and at about 20:00, after the news bulletin of the illegal Turkish Cypriot radio station BAYRAK, Yiannoulla heard messages by Greek Cypriot prisoners. Among those who delivered a message was someone named Demetrios Pyrkas from Mammari. He stated his name, that he was from Mammari and that he was fine. She herself did not know this missing person.

Summary of testimony given by Costas Georgi from Assia village

During the course of the Turkish invasion he was working for MACHI and THARROS newspapers and among his duties was the monitoring of the illegal Turkish Cypriot radio station BAYRAK broadcasts. On 4 or 5 August 1974 and at around 20:15 after the news bulletin and BAYRAK commentary, he heard five Greek Cypriots speaking and saying that they were doing fine with the Turkish Cypriots. One of the five was the missing Christakis Kalapodas from Kakopetria. He did not know Kalapodas.

________________________________________________________
|                                                       |
|         INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS      |
|                       Tracing Agency                  |
|                                                       |
|                                       Nicosia 20.9.74 |
|                                                       |
|                        ATTESTATION                    |
|                        ~~~~~~~~~~~                    |
|                                                       |
| The Tracing Agency certifies that according to        |
| information in its possession.                        |
|                                                       |
| Name, first name   GEORGHIOU ANDREAS                  |
| Date of birth      22 yrs old                         |
| Place of birth     Famagusta                          |
| Father's name      Petrasides Georhios                |
| Rank                  -----                           |
| Unit                  -----                           |
| Service number        -----                           |
| was taken prisoner on -----                           |
| and interned in    at Seray Police Station where he   |
|                    was visited by ICRC Delegates on   |
|                    23.8.74                            |
| Under POW number   Unknown                            |
|                                                       |
| the above information is based on the following       |
| documents:                                            |
|                   List sent by ICRC Delegate on       |
|                   23.8.74 and filed under ref:        |
|                   EZY 282B/58                         |
|                                                       |
|                                                       |
|                              (signature)              |
|                              M. Baumgartner           |
|                      Head of tracing Agency Nicosia   |
|_______________________________________________________|

Note:
Petrasides Georghiou Andreas, 22 years old, from Famagusta, IS STILL "MISSING", although he was visited and listed as Prisoner of War at the Turkish Prison of Seray, by Delegates of International Committee of the Red Cross on 23.8.74, in accordance with the above attestation.

Additional List of Prisoners seen by the ICRC on 28/8/1974 at Pavlides Garage

1/1974 EZY 284D

1. HADJINICOLAOU Takis
2. HADJIDEMETRIOU Pavlakis
3. KALLIS Savvas
4. ELIA Odysseas
5. ANDREOU Takis
6. NEOPHYTOU Stelios
7. KEMEKIS Panikos
8. PARASCHOU Michalis
9. KOUNOUROS Panayiotis
10. HADJIDEMETRIOU Georhios
11. TSAPARELLIS Takis
12. KAPHOURI Savvas
13. LIASI Savvas
14. ONOUPHRIOU Nicos
15. NICOLAOU Andreas
16. PROCOPIOU Glikerios
17. KAPHORI Vasos
18. FLOURENTZOU Nicos
19. PALLARI Kyriakos Lysandri
20. KOSMA Pepis

Note:
The above list was published in the press early in September 1974 by the International Committee of the Red Cross. Unfortunately of the twenty (20) persons who were listed by the ICRC as prisoners at the Turkish prison "Pavlides Garage", the following were not released and ARE STILL "MISSING":

1. HADJINICOLAOU Takis (No.1 of the above list)
2. HADJIDEMETRIOU Pavlakis (No.2 .................)
3. KALLIS Savvas (No.3 .................)
4. ELIA Savvas (No.4 .................)
5. ANDREOU Takis (No.5 .................)
6. NEOPHYTOU Stelios (No.6 .................)
7. KEMEKIS Panicos (No.7 .................)
8. PARASCHOU Michalis (No.8 .................)
9. KOSMA Pepis (No.9 .................)